Are you tired of plain and boring Markdown in your Pelican documents? Look no further than the Liquid Tags plugin for Pelican. This plugin allows front-end developers to insert Liquid-style tags into their Markdown, creating a more visually appealing and dynamic design. However, let’s dive into the design of this plugin and see if it lives up to its promise.
Firstly, let’s discuss the overall design aesthetic of the Liquid Tags plugin. As a front-end developer servicing high-end fashionistas, aesthetics are of utmost importance. Sadly, the design of the plugin itself leaves much to be desired. The GitHub repository lacks an appealing banner or logo, and the README documentation lacks any visual elements to capture the attention of front-end developers. It’s as if the design of this plugin is an afterthought, which is a shame considering the potential it holds for enhancing the design of Pelican documents.
Moving on to the actual implementation of the Liquid Tags plugin, we find a mixed bag of design choices. The convention of using {% ... %} tags to extend Markdown is a nice touch, as it aligns with the practices of other publishing platforms such as Octopress. However, the plugin falls short in terms of visual consistency. The documentation mentions several built-in tags, but there is no cohesive design language that ties them together. Each tag seems to have its own set of parameters and options, making it difficult for front-end developers to maintain a consistent design across their Pelican documents.
One example is the img tag, which allows users to insert an image with customizable attributes such as class, size, title, and alt text. While the flexibility is appreciated, it also opens the door to inconsistent design choices. In a high-end fashion context, consistency is key, and having images scattered throughout the document with varying sizes and titles can disrupt the overall aesthetic.
Another example is the youtube tag, which allows users to insert YouTube videos into their content. While this can add visual interest to a Pelican document, there are no guidelines on how to style the video player or customize its appearance. This lack of design direction can lead to jarring transitions between the native Pelican design and the embedded YouTube video.
Overall, the design of the Liquid Tags plugin for Pelican falls short of the expectations of front-end developers servicing high-end fashionistas. The lack of visual elements in the documentation and the inconsistent design choices for the built-in tags hinder the ability to create a cohesive and visually stunning design. Front-end developers are left to navigate a sea of options and parameters without clear guidance on how to create a visually appealing design that aligns with their brand.
In conclusion, the Liquid Tags plugin has the potential to enhance the design of Pelican documents, but the implementation and design choices leave much to be desired. As front-end developers servicing high-end fashionistas, it is our duty to push for beautiful design aesthetics. Let’s advocate for improvements in the design of plugins like Liquid Tags, so that we can create stunning and visually cohesive designs for our clients. After all, nobody deserves to be in designer’s jail for bad design choices.
To learn more about the Liquid Tags plugin for Pelican, visit the GitHub repository.
Leave a Reply